SURVIVAL TIME AND EFFECTIVENESS OF GIRDLING AND HERBICIDE METHODS IN THE CONTROL OF Pinus elliotti: A CASE STUDY IN SECONDARY ATLANTIC FOREST IN SOUTHEASTERN BRAZIL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24278/rif.2026.38e984Resumen
Pinus elliottii is a notorious invasive exotic species in grassland ecosystems; however, it can also establish itself in forest ecosystems during secondary succession. In this case, killing invasive standing trees is preferable to cutting, as it reduces damage to surrounding native vegetation. This study evaluates the survival time and effectiveness of two methods for killing standing Pinus elliottii trees in a regenerating forest ecosystem: girdling (a 50 cm wide ring, followed by scarification of the wound surface) and herbicide (a 30% glyphosate solution injected into three perforations in the stem). The application times of the treatments were recorded for each tree individually. Tree survival times and rates were monitored over 24 months and eight days and compared using survival analysis models and binomial test, respectively. Girdling resulted in longer survival times, but survival rates did not differ significantly between the two methods. All trees in the control group remained alive during the monitoring period. The average time per tree for girdling application was 2.3 minutes longer, resulting in a higher labor cost. However, this additional cost was less than the cost of purchasing the herbicide. Our data indicate that girdling, although resulting in longer survival time, is more effective than herbicide in killing invasive Pinus elliottii trees under the soil and climate conditions of this experiment.
Descargas
Citas
Abreu RCR. 2013. Ecologia e controle da invasão de Pinus elliottii no campo cerrado. Tese de Doutorado, Universidade de São Paulo, São Carlos. Disponível: <https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/18/18139/tde-23092013-085713/publico/TeseRodolfoCesarRealDeAbreu.pdf>. Acesso: 10 mar. 2024.
Abreu RCR, Durigan G. 2011. Changes in the plant community of a Brazilian grassland savannah after 22 years of invasion by Pinus elliottii Engelm. Plant Ecology & Diversity 4(2-3): 269-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2011.594101
Adelino JRP, Heringer G, Diagne C, Courchamp F, Faria LDB, Zenni RD. 2021. The economic costs of biological invasions in Brazil: a first assessment. In: Zenni RD, McDermott S, García-Berthou E, Essl F. (Ed). The economic costs of biological invasions around the world. NeoBiota 67:349–374. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.67.59185
Bechara FC, Reis A, Bourscheid K, Vieira NK, Trentin BE. 2013. Reproductive biology and early establishment of Pinus elliottii var. elliottii in Brazilian sandy coastal plain vegetation: implications for biological invasion. Scientia Agricola 70(2): 88-92.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162013000200005
Bitencourt ACC, Pivello V. 2013. Manejo da palmeira invasora Archontophoenix cunninghamiana na reserva florestal da Cidade Universitária (USP – São Paulo). In: XI Congresso de Ecologia do Brasil, Porto Seguro. Porto Seguro: Sociedade de Ecologia do Brasil. Disponível: <https://www.seb-ecologia.org.br/revistas/indexar/anais/xiceb/pdf/901.pdf >. Acesso: 12 fev. 2024.
Burrows GE. 2021. Gymnosperm resprouting - a review. Plants 10(12), 2551. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10122551
Carvalho FA, Abreu RCR, Barros KART, Fonseca SN, Santiago DS, Oliveira DE, Assis DC, Pimentel FO, Lyra MFB, Furtado SG. 2014. A comunidade arbórea regenerante de um ‘ecossistema emergente’ dominado pela espécie invasora Pinus elliottii Engelm. Interciencia 39 (5):307-312. Disponível: <https://www.interciencia.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/307-c-1%C2%BA-CARBALHO-6.pdf>. Acesso: 30 jan. 2024.
Chano V, López R, Pita P, Collada C, Soto A. 2015. Proliferation of axial parenchymatic xylem cells is a key step in wound closure of girdled stems in Pinus canariensis. BMC Plant Biology 15: 64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-015-0447-z.
Cielo-Filho R, Baitello JB, Toniato MTZ, Kanashiro MM, Mattos IFA, Aguiar OT, Souza, SCPM, Zimback L, Franco GADC. 2017. A vegetação da Estação Ecológica de Paranapanema: subsídios para o Plano de Manejo. Instituto Florestal Série Registros 55: 75-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/ifsr.2018.003
Crawley MJ. 2013. The R Book. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 1060 p. Disponível: <https://www.cs.upc.edu/~robert/teaching/estadistica/TheRBook.pdf>. Acesso: 20 jan. 2024.
Dechoum MS, Ziller SR. 2013. Métodos para controle de plantas exóticas invasoras. Biotemas 26(1): 69-77. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7925.2013v26n1p69
Du B, Luan Q, Nin Z, Sun H, Jiang J. 2022. Radial growth and non structural carbohydrate partitioning response to resin tapping of slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm. var. elliottii). Journal of Forestry 33: 243-433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-021-01357-1.
Durigan G, Abreu RCR, Pilon NAL, Ivanauskas NM, Virilo CB, Pivello VR. 2020. Invasão por Pinus spp: ecologia, prevenção, controle e restauração. São Paulo: Instituto Florestal. 63 p. Disponível: <: https://www.infraestruturameioambiente.sp.gov.br/institutoflorestal/2020/04/invasao-por-pinus-spp-ecologia-prevencao-controle-e-restauracao/>. Acesso: 04 fev. 2024
Gonçalves GS, Andrade LA, Xavier KRF, Silva JF. 2015. Métodos de controle de Prosopis julilora (Sw.) DC. (Fabaceae) em áreas invadidas no semiárido do Brasil. Ciência Florestal 25(3): 645-653. https://doi.org/10.5902/1980509819615
Green JL, Maloy O, Capizzi J. 2011. Diagnosing plant problems. In: Kentucky Master Gardener Manual. ID194. Cooperative Extension Service, University of Kentucky College of Agriculture, Lexington, UK, pp 96-108. Disponível: < http://www2.ca.uky.edu/agcomm/pubs/ID/ID194/ID194.pdf >. Acesso: 20 abr. 2024.
Gunstone T, Cornelisse T, Klein K, Dubey A, Donley N. 2021. Pesticides and soil invertebrates: a hazard assessment. Frontiers in Environmental Science 9: 643847. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.643847.
Knapp LSP, Coyle DR, Dey DC, Fraser JS, Hutchinson T, Jenkings MA, Kern CC, Knapp BO, Maddox D, Pinchot C, Wan GG. 2023. Invasive plant management in eastern North American Forests: a systematic review. Forest Ecology and Management 550: 121517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121517
Kronka FJN, Bertolani F, Ponce RH. 2005. A cultura do Pinus no Brasil. São Paulo: Sociedade Brasileira de Silvicultura. 160 p. Disponível: <https://www.celso-foelkel.com.br/Livro_Cultura_Pinus_Brasil.html>. Acesso: 15 jan. 2024.
Lazzaro LG, Barros, ABSC, Esteves R, Souza SCPM, Ivanauskas NM. 2019. Métodos para controle químico de palmeiras invasoras em Unidade de Conservação na região metropolitana de São Paulo. Biotemas 32(2): 55-70. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7925.2019v32n2p55.
Oliveira Jr. RS, Constantini J, Inoue M H. 2011. Biologia e manejo de plantas daninhas. Curitiba: Omnipax. 348 p. Disponível: <https://www2.ufpel.edu.br/prg/sisbi/bibct/acervo/biologia_e_manejo_de_plantas_daninhas.pdf >. Acesso: 08 mar. 2024.
Merceron NR, Lamarque L J, Delzon S, Porté AJ. 2016. Killing it softly: girdling as an efficient eco-friendly method to locally remove invasive Acer negundo. Ecological Restoration 34(4): 297-305. https://doi.org/10.3368/er.34.4.297
Mims JT, O’brien J, Aubrey DP. 2018. Belowground carbohydrate reserves of mature southern pines reflect seedling strategy to evolutionary history of disturbance. Forests 9 (10), 653. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9100653
Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Fonseca, GAB, Kent J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853–858. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501
Novais PS, Rossi M., Mattos IFA, Kanashiro MM. 2010. Solos como subsídio ao planejamento ambiental: unidades de conservação e produção de Paranapanema. In: 4º. Seminário de Iniciação Científica do Instituto Florestal. São Paulo: Instituto Florestal - Série Registros 42:199-204. Disponível: <https://smastr16.blob.core.windows.net/iflorestal/RIF/SerieRegistros/IFSR42/IFSR42.pdf>. Acesso: 24 abr. 2024.
R Core Team. 2024. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Disponível: <https://www.R-project.org/>. Acesso: 20 jan. 2024.
Ramos M, Magro TC, Couto HTZ, Castro TN. 2019. Dispersão e impacto de Pinus elliottii Engelm. var. elliottii em área ripária na Floresta Nacional de Capão Bonito – SP. Ciência Florestal 29 (1):75-85. https://doi.org/10.5902/1980509825789
Richardson, DM, Rejmánek M. 2011. Trees and shrubs as invasive alien species – a global review. Diversity and Distributions 17: 788–809. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00782.x
Santos MP, Araujo MJ, Silva PHM. 2021. Natural establishment of Pinus spp. around seed production areas and orchards. Forest Ecology and Management. 494, 119333. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119333
São Paulo, Secretaria de Meio Ambiente. 2018. Plano de Manejo da Estação Ecológica de Paranapanema. Disponível: <https://smastr16.blob.core.windows.net/2001/2018/11/d-paranapanema-plano-de-manejo.pdf >. Acesso: 11 jan. 2024.
Simberloff D, Nuñez MA, Legard NJ, Pauchard A, Richardson DM, Sarasola M, Van Wilgen BW, Zalba SM, Zenni R, Bustamante R, Pena E, Ziller SR. 2010. Spread and impact of introduced conifers in South America: lessons from other southern hemisphere regions. Austral Ecology 35: 489-504. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2009.02058.x
Soil Survey Staff .1999. Soil taxonomy: a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys, second edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. 886 p. Disponível: <https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-06/Soil%20Taxonomy.pdf>. Acesso: 18 mai. 2024.
Tavares EL, Peres CK, Cotian LFP, Machado MWK, Carvalho AG, Zanuncio AJV. 2017. Comparação entre métodos de abate de árvores de Eucalyptus spp. Revista Espacios 38 (11): 14-19. Disponível: <https://www.revistaespacios.com/a17v38n11/17381114.html>. Acesso: 30 mar.2024.
Therneau T. 2024. A Package for Survival Analysis in R. R package version 3.5-8. Disponível: <https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival>. Acesso: 17 jan. 2024.
Ventura A, Berengut G, Victor MAM. 1965. Características edafo-climáticas das dependências do Serviço Florestal do Estado de São Paulo. Silvicultura em São Paulo 4/5: 57-140.
Vila-Aiub M, Casas C, Gundel PE. 2018. The role of plant size in the selection of glyphosate resistance in Sorghum halepense. Pest Management Science 74(11): 2460-2467. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4923.
Wilcove DS, Rothstein D, Dubow J, Phillips A, Losos E. 1998. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States: assessing the relative importance of habitat destruction, alien species, pollution, overexploitation, and disease. BioScience 48: 607-615. https://doi.org/10.2307/1313420.
Wilczek-Ponce A, Włoch W, Iqbal M. 2021. How do trees grow in girth? Controversy on the role of cellular events in the vascular cambium. Acta Biotheoretica 69: 643-670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-021-09418-y.
Yamada T, Castro PRC. 2007. Efeitos do glifosato nas plantas: implicações fisiológicas e agronômicas. IPNI - Encarte Técnico, Informações Agronômicas 119: 1-32. Disponível: <http://www.ipni.net/publication/ia-brasil.nsf/0/737cd8a86525a2ec83257aa1005fe1b9/$file/encarte-119.pdf>. Acesso: 23 mai. 2024.
Zanchetta D, Pinheiro LS. 2007. Análise biofísica dos processos envolvidos na invasão biológica de sementes de Pinus elliottii na Estação Ecológica de Itirapina-SP e alternativas de manejo. Climatologia e Estudos da Paisagem 2 (1):72-90. Disponível: <https://www.periodicos.rc.biblioteca.unesp.br/index.php/climatologia/article/view/230/643>.Acess: 19 mar. 2024.
Zenni RD, Simberloff D. 2013. Number of source populations as a potential driver of pine invasions in Brazil. Biological Invasions 15(7): 1623-1639. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10530-012-0397-4.
Ziller SR. 2000. Plantas exóticas invasoras: a ameaça da contaminação biológica. Revista Ciência Hoje 30(178): 77-79. Disponível: <https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/4498434/mod_resource/content/4/planta%20invasora.pdf>. Acesso: 02 fev. 2024.
Descargas
Archivos adicionales
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Revista del Instituto Forestal

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.












